Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
Asiamma W/o Ismail – Appellant
Versus
N.t.thomas S/o Thomas – Respondent
Please provide the actual legal document content within
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent no.1's appeal (Para 4) |
| 2. application for land grant (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. arguments heard by the court (Para 6) |
| 4. cognizance of kumkidar's privileges (Para 8) |
| 5. examination of authority's actions (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. dispute origins and legal framework (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. writ petition allowed (Para 13) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The facts leading to the case are as under:
3. Pursuant to repurchase, respondent No.1 started asserting possessory rights over the kumki land attached to the warga land. This compelled petitioner to file the suit in O.S.No.179/1992 seeking possession of kumki land from respondent No.1. This said suit was decreed by judgment dated 29.2.2000.
5. Respondent No.1, after suffering two decrees from the competent civil court, applied for grant of land before the Akrama-Sakrama Committee, where respondent No.2/Tahsildar serves as the Secretary. Invoking Section 94(B) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as "KLR Act, 1964"), respondent No.2 issued an order on 20.11.2001 granting kumki land to respondent No.1. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner. However, the Deputy Commissioner dismiss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
