ORAL ORDER

Heard Sri Sharathkumar Shetty, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Parashuram, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

2. The petitioners are the tenants in the property owned by respondent Nos.2 and 3, which is the subject matter of mortgage with respondent No.1. The petitioners - tenants and the lease being in subsistence, this Court had directed the petitioners to file an affidavit of undertaking with regard to the timeline by which the premises would be vacated, which is now in the possession of respondent No.1 - the bank.

3. The petitioners have filed the affidavit, which reads as follows:

“1. We submit that we are the Petitioner in the above case, and we acquainted with the facts of the case, hence we swearing to this affidavit.

2. We submit that we are the tenants under respondent No.2 and 3 and the 1^st Respondent has trying to dispossess our possession, hence we approach this Hon'ble court and matter posted on 25.03.2025 and this Hon'ble Court directed me to file undertaking affidavit, hence this affidavit.

3. We submit that the Respondent No.2 and 3 undertook to clear the dispute with Respondent No.1 and as per the assurance we are in possession and if the Respondent