SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3510

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
SRI. MOHAMMED ZIYAULLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:NEERAJ SASTRY ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

“a) That this Hon’ble court may be pleased to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.29565/2023 pending before the VII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bangalore, for the alleged offences punishable U/s 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 149 of IPC of IPC r/w Section 3 & 4 of D.P. Act including Complaint, FIR, Charge Sheet in C.C.No.29565/2023 registered by the Respondent No.1 Police, and allow this Petition in the interest of justice.

b) Pass any such orders as this Hon’ble court deems fit, in the interest of justice.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl.SPP for 1st respondent and perused the material on record. For the order proposed, notice to 2nd respondent is dispensed with.

3. The petitioner as well as 2nd respondent have filed a Memorandum of Settlement dated 07.11.2024 before the Family Court, Bangalore, which reads as under:-

“ MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF CPC READ WITH RULES 24 AND 125 OF THE KARNATAKA CIVIL PROCEDURE (MEDIATION)

RULES, 2005.

The parties above named beg to submit as follows:

I. The plaintiff has filed the above petition under order VII Rule 1 and 2 Code Civil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top