SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 22977

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
SRI MADAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


The Respondent No.2 had filed a private complaint under

Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Sections

448, 452, 453, 506 read with Section 149 of IPC, alleging that

on 14.04.2012 at about 7 p.m., accused No.2, who is the Junior

Assistant Engineer and accused No.1 had trespassed into the

subject property and fixed the electrical meter to the wall of the

shed unauthorisedly with an intention to knock off the property.

It was further alleged that, on 12.05.2012, accused No.1 along

3

with ten goondas came with a J.C.B. with an intention to

demolish the compound wall and also to fell the trees standing

on the subject property and also broke open the lock of the shed

and snatched the key of the shed and also threatened the

complainant that they will cause bodily harm, if the complainant

does not leave the subject property.

2.

The learned Magistrate referred the complaint to the

police for investigation under Section 156(3) of Cr.PC. The

Police registered the FIR for the aforesaid offences and after

investigation submitted the 'B' report with the learned Magistrate

stating that the dispute between the parties is purely civil in

nature which is evident from the suit f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top