SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 22699

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
MR R PRAVEEN – Appellant
Versus
MR MARIYAPPA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:VARUN PAPIREDDY ,Respondent Advocate: K P BHUVAN FOR R2 (NOC)

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is filed praying to setting aside the judgment and decree dated 16.4.2010 passed by District & Session Judge, Fast Tract Court-V, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore in RA No.48/2008 and judgment and decree dated 8.2.2008 passed by II Additional Civil Judge (Jn. Dn), Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore in OS No.312/1998.

2. The appellant was the plaintiff and respondents No.1 and 2 were defendants No.1 and 2 in OS No.312/1998.

3. The parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

4. The plaintiff has filed a suit for the reliefs of permanent Injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with possession of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property. It is the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court that he is a absolute owner for having purchased the suit schedule property from Smt.V.Jayalakshmi under registered sale deed dated 7.4.1998 and he is in possession of the same. It is stated that originally suit schedule property belongs to defendant No.1, he has executed GPA in favour of Smt.V.Jayalakshmi authorizing her deal with the property. The katha of the suit schedule property was in the name of defendant No.1 and he authori

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top