Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
N S SANJAY GOWDA, J
SRI S KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of petitioners and initial appointments (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. seeking quash of educational qualification requirements (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. state's counterarguments on qualifications (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. historical legal framework of recruitment (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. introduction of new recruitment rules and implications (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. consequences of repealing the 1971 regulations (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. protection of employees' promotional rights under previous rules (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. further reasoning supporting application of old rules (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 9. decision for the writ petitions (Para 36) |
| 10. additional directions regarding promotions (Para 37 , 38) |
ORDER
1. The petitioners are all serving employees of the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (“the BBMP”).
2. For the sake of convenience, the initial appointment of the petitioners and the promotions that they have secured in their career are stated as under:
a. WP 14885/2020: SDA to FDA to Manager
b. WP 12052/2021:
i. SDA to RI to Assessor
ii. TI to RI to Assessor
iii. D grp to 1st grade RI to Assessor iv. TI to 1st grade RI to Assessor
v. TI to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
