Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. R. NATARAJ, J
SANTHOSH SHETTY S/O LATE NARAYANA SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of parties and relevant case details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. outline of the prosecution's case and trial proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding identification and applicability of ipc sections. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. court's observations on evidence supporting conviction. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. final decision regarding modification of sentence. (Para 14 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
The petitioners have challenged the judgment of conviction dated 24.07.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), JMFC, Moodbidri (henceforth referred to as 'Trial Court' for short) in C.C.No.716/2004 convicting them for the offence punishable under Section 392 read with Section 34 of IPC and the consequent sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- each. The petitioners have also challenged the judgment dated 01.08.2013 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore (henceforth referred to as 'Appellate Court' for short) in Crl.A.No.296/2008 by which, the judgment of the Trial Court was upheld.
2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arraigned before the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
