Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G UMA, J
HARISH. K – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner is accused of conspiracy in exam tampering. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the prosecution provides details on the modus operandi. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 3. the prosecutor argues potential evidence tampering. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. the court explains reasoning for denying bail. (Para 13 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. the court emphasizes societal impact and public trust. (Para 14 , 17 , 18 , 27) |
| 6. final judgment dismisses the petition. (Para 28) |
ORDER
The petitioner-accused No.34 is before this Court seeking grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., in Crime No.60 of 2022 of High Grounds Police Station, pending on the file of the learned XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (P.C. Act), Bengaluru (CCH No.24), registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120B , 36, 37, 119, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 201 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and under Sections 7 (a)(c), 7A and 8 and 13(1)(a) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act (for short 'the PC Act'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant P Narasimhamurthy.
2. Heard Sri C H Jadhav, learned senior advocate for Sri Chetan Jadhav, learned counsel for the petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
