SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1444

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
SRI.M JAYA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MAHAMAD TAHIR A ,Respondent Advocate:

ORDER

The petitioner filed a petition under Sections 10, 11, 12, and

13 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, seeking to be declared insolvent.

2. A preliminary objection was raised regarding the maintainability of the petition. After hearing the petitioner, the learned District and Sessions Judge issued an order stating that due to the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, stands repealed. Therefore, the petition was deemed not maintainable, as an efficacious remedy is provided under Section 179(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

3. Counsel for the petitioner argued that no notification has been issued to enforce the provisions contained in Chapter 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Thus, the learned District Judge had jurisdiction to consider the petition for adjudication of the petitioner as insolvent.

4. Sri H. Shanthi Bhushan, learned Additional Solicitor General of India for respondents No.1 and 3, submitted that no notification has been issued to give effect to the provisions of Chapter 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. 5. After considering the submissions from both sides.

6. Section 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top