ORDER

This revision petition is filed against the order passed on I.A.No.II filed under Section 125(2) of Cr.P.C., being aggrieved in not considering and not granting interim maintenance to petitioner No.1-wife.

2. The office has raised objection that in view of Section 19(4) of Family Court Act against the interim order, the revision petition is not maintainable.

3. The Family Court vide order dated 24.07.2020 has passed an order on I.A.No.II filed under Section 125(2) of Family Court Act granting only interim maintenance of Rs.20,000/- pm., to petitioner No.2-child, but has not considered the application for interim maintenance to petitioner No.1-wife. The order impugned is an interlocutory order passed on I.A.No.II. As per Section 19(4) of Family Court Act against the interlocutory order, the revision petition is not maintainable.

4. However, considering the records that the petitioners had filed C.Misc.No.185/2020 before the Family Court on 24.02.2020, but till today after lapse of four years, the Family Court has not passed any order on the petition filed by the petitioners. The petitioners are wife and child. The maintenance petition is filed on the ground that the respondent has deserted the petitioners. Therefore, for survival and for getting maintenance, a speedy remedy is provided under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.

5. If these types of petitions are pending for long time as in the present case, then the very object and purpose of enacting Section 125 of Cr.P.C., is defeated. If the Courts delay in disposing of the petitions within a reasonable period of time, then it would frustrate the petitioners and the very object of providing such benevolent provision is of no use. But the Family Court is not sensitive in considering the petitions on merits. Hence, the very object of establishing of Family Court exclusively dealing with family matters in providing effective and speedy remedy goes vain. These types of cases involve human relations aspect and survival in life of wife and children are involved. Therefore, in order to avoid such a miserable life by the wife and children where they are deserted by the husband and for sustaining in life, such a speedy remedy is provided under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. These are all not considered by the Family Court. For one or other reason, the petition is pending for more than four years since 24.02.2020. Taking long period of four years is nothing, but insensitiveness on the part of the Family Court.

6. Therefore, the Family Court is hereby directed to dispose of the instant petition within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Both the parties shall co-operate with the Family Court for early disposal as directed above.

7. It is common experience of the Court that wherever petitions are filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., for seeking maintenance basically involves question of survival in the society, but the petitions are being delayed in the Family Courts across the State. Therefore, considering the principles of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the catena of decisions where it is held that speedy trial/enquiry is the fundamental rights of the parties as envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

8. The object and reasons of Section 125 of Cr.P.C., is a beneficial legislation providing social security to the destitute. To achieve the aspirations of Preamble and Part IV of Directive Principles of State Policy of Constitution of India, Section 125 is the remedy to achieve social justice. Sustaining life in the society does not mean mere animal existence, but to live with dignity even at minimum level of income. When the wife, children, father and mother have become destitute, the survival in the society is paramount thing and getting means by maintenance cannot be stretched for too long period. At the very moment they become destitute from that day onwards their struggle starts to survive in the society. The hungry of stomach cannot wait