Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL, MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, JJ
THE MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
SRI PRAKASH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claimant nos.1 & 2 are (Para 4) |
| 2. the claimants filed mvc (Para 5) |
| 3. respondent no.1 did not contest (Para 6) |
| 4. before the tribunal in support (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. sri.p.s.kailas shankar, learned counsel (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. the deceased was a bachelor (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. in the light of the above (Para 13) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)
Though the matter is coming on for admission, with the consent of both parties the same is taken for final disposal.
2. Whether the compensation awarded under the impugned award in MVC No.5337/2022 on the file of XXIII Additional Small Causes Judge and MACT, Bengaluru, is just is the question involved in the case.
3. The appellant is respondent No.2, respondent Nos.1 to 5 were claimant Nos.1 to 5 and respondent No.6 was respondent No.1 in MVC No.5337/2022. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to henceforth according to their ranks before the Tribunal.
4. Claimant Nos.1 & 2 are the parents, claimant No.3 is the younger sister, claimant Nos.4 & 5 are the grand parents of deceased Darshan. On 23.09.2022 at 05.45p.m. when Darshan and one Suresh were standing along with motorcycle bearing Reg.No.KA-44-V-3802 at
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
