SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 40408

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
RAYAGONDAPPA – Appellant
Versus
RAJANA AND ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SANJEEVKUMAR C PATIL ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of certiorari by quashing annexure-h order dated 20.04.2024, on I.A.No.5 passed by the Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Vijayapur, in R.A.No.115/2022.

b. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of certiorari by quashing Annexure-J, order dated 20.04.2024 on I.A.No.6, passed by the II Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Vijayapur in R.A.No.115/2022.

c. Issue a writ, direction or order which deem fit under the fact and circumstances of the case.

The petitioner was a defendant in O.S.No.16/2018 filed by the respondents for declaration of title and consequential injunction. The said suit came to be decreed vide judgment dated 22.08.2022, which was challenged by the petitioner in R.A.No.115/2022. In the said appeal, the petitioner had filed an application in I.A.No.V under Order 26 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure to measure the property and certain other actions. Thereafter, another application in I.A.No.VI had been filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of Code of Civil Procedure to pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top