2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 28402
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.250 OF 2022
C/W
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.183 OF 2022
IN CRL.R.P.NO.250/2022:
BETWEEN:
N. NARASIMHA MURTHY,
S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH,
AGE: 45 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.1059, 3RD BLOCK,
3RD STAGE, 5TH 'A' MAIN ROAD,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560079.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI B. NAIK, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. B.O.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA POLICE,
BENGALURU CITY DIVISION POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-01.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. C.H.JADHAV, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VADAVADAGI, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)
2
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH
SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2021
PASSED ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER U/S
227
OF
CR.P.C.
OF
CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE
IN
SPL.C.C.NO.493/2015 BY THE HONOURABLE XXXII ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR
CBI CASES (CCH-34), BENGALURU PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A
AND MAY BE PLEASED TO ORDER FOR DISCHARGE OF
PETITIONER IN THE AFORESAID CASE, CONSEQUENTLY THIS
HONOURABLE COURT MY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AND
CHARGE SHEET AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FILED SUIT
SPL.C.C.NO.493/2015.
IN CRL.R.P.NO.183/2022:
BETWEEN:
V. BHASKAR @ 420 BHASKAR,
S/O LATE B.M.VENKATARAMANAPPA,
AGED 50 YEARS,
R/AT NO.105, GROUND FLOOR,
SKYLINE GOLDEN RACE APARTMENT,
BEHIND RAMAKRISHNA ASHRAM,
GAVIPURAM, GUTTAHALLI,
BENGALURU-560003.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANE SHIVAJI HANAMANTAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
SPECIAL INVESTIGATING TEAM,
CID.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENT
3
(BY SRI. C.H.JADHAV, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VADAVADAGI, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH
SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2021
PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES AT
BENGALURU
(CCH-34)
IN
SPL.C.C.NO.493/2015
HTEREBY
POSTING THE MATTER FOR FRAMING CHARGE AGAINST THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 ALONG WITH THE ACCUSED NOS.1
FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 8 AND 9 OF
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988 AND SECTION 201,
384, 419, 506 READ WITH SECTION 120B OF IPC AND
CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION.
THESE PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR
ON
06.01.2023
AND
COMING
ON
PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Crl.R.P.No.250/2022 is filed by the accused No.3 in
Spl.C.C.No.493/2015 pending trial before the XXXII
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge
for CBI Cases at Bengaluru, challenging an Order dated
18.12.2021, by which, an application filed by him under
Section 227 read with Section 239 of Cr.P.C. was rejected.
2.
Crl.R.P.No.183/2022 is filed by the accused
No.2 in Spl.C.C.No.493/2015 pending trial before the
4
XXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special
Judge for CBI Cases at Bengaluru (henceforth referred to
as 'Trial Court' for short) challenging an Order dated
18.12.2021, by which, the Court posted the case for
framing charge against all the accused.
3.
An investigation was set in motion by the
Lokayukta police in Crime No.61/2015 on the basis of a
written information dated 18.08.2015, furnished by Mr.D.
Udayashankar, who then was a Chief Engineer at
Karnataka Health System Development and Reform Project
(henceforth referred to as CW.1). CW.1 claimed that he
was earlier working as Superintendent Engineer, PWD,
Building Circle, Bengaluru, between May 2012 to March
2015 and was in-charge of maintenance of all Government
buildings including the office of the Lokayukta and the
official residence of Lokayukta. CW.1 alleged that on
05.02.2015, he received a call from a person named,
Krishna Rao and introduced himself as the Personal
Secretary of Lokayukta and informed that the Lokayukta
5
wanted to speak to him. CW.1 alleged that on the same
day, he went to the official residence of Lokayukta at 6.00
p.m., where he met a person, who introduced himself as
Krishna Rao and he informed CW.1 to wait in the visitors
area. When CW.1 asked Mr. Krishna Rao whether there
was any problem in the official residence, he replied that
there was no problem but there could be some complaints
against CW.1, for which, he could be summoned.
Mr.Krishna Rao introduced accused No.3, who was present
and left CW.1 in the company of accused No.3. The
accused No.3 informed CW.1 that he would introduce him
to the Lokayukta and that CW.1 could speak to him.
However, a person walked into the visitors area and
accused No.3 introduced him to CW.1 as the son of
Lokayukta (Accused No.1). The accused No.1 informed
CW.1 that his mobile phone was under surveillance and
that there were lot of complaints against him. CW.1 denied
it and asked him the nature of complaint. However,
accused No.1 instructed CW.1 to talk to accused No.3 and
sort it out and went inside the house. Accused No.3
6
advised CW.1 to settle the issue at the earliest and avoid
any problems in future. CW.1 requested the accused No.3
to disclose the nature of complaint and informed him that
the marriage of his daughter was scheduled and a DPC
was already held to consider his promotion as Chief
Engineer. He therefore requested accused No.3 not to
create trouble for him. The accused No.3 is stated to have
informed CW.1 that if the issue is not sorted, then the
marriage of his daughter and the prospect of his promotion
might be affected. CW.1, allegedly, apprehensive of the
above, requested accused No.3 as to what should be done.
The accused No.3 then allegedly demanded a sum of
Rs.3,00,00,000-00 and when CW.1 claimed that he did not
have that much of money, the accused No.3 asked CW.1
to pay at least Rs.2,00,00,000-00. CW.1 informed him that
he has to raise a loan to give the money or to draw his
GPF and pay him and postpone the marriage of his
daughter. To this, the accused No.3 is stated to have
informed CW.1 to decide what he should do and advised
him not to loose the opportunity. CW.1 alleged that since
7
he apprehended that a raid by the Lokayukta could affect
the marriage of his daughter and his promotion, he met
accused No.3 at Atria Hotel and agreed to pay how much
ever possible. CW.1 later disclosed this to his friend
Venkataramana Gowda