SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 194

C/W RPFC No. 200105 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 200003 OF 2023

C/W

REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 200105 OF 2023

IN RPFC.No.200003/2023:

BETWEEN:

    1. Mr. SAGAR S/O SUBASH NAVATAKE

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 307, B-BLOCK,

BHARATH PRIDE APARTMENTS GUNJ,

KALABURAGI 585104

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. ABDUL MUQHTADIR,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. BHAGYASHREE

W/O SAGAR NAVATAKE AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,

RESIDING AT DASHYAL VILLAGE

TQ AND DIST, VIJAYPURA 586130.

2. SHIVANSH

S/O SAGAR NAVATAKE AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS,

SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS

NATURAL MOTHER

C/W RPFC No. 200105 of 2023

BHAGYASHREE W/O SAGAR NAVATAKE,

RESIDING AT DASHYAL VILLAGE

TQ AND DIST, VIJAYPURA 586130.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. DEEPAK.B.BARAD, ADVOCATE FOR R-1;

R-2 IS MINOR AND REPRESENTED BY R-1)

THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE

FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN CRL. MISC.30/2021 FROM THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, VIJAYAPURA AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.30/2021 DATED 18.06.2022 BY THE HONOURABLE COURT OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY

COURT, AT VIJAYAPURA IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, ETC.

IN RPFC.No.200105/2023:

BETWEEN:

    1. BHAGYASHREE W/O SAGAR NAVATAKE

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

OCC.HOUSEHOLD WORK,

RESIDING AT DASHYAL,

TQ AND DIST VIJAYPURA-586101.

    2. SHIVANSH S/O SAGAR NAVATAKE

AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS,

R/O DSHYAL, TQ AND DISTRICT,

VIJAYAPUR-586101.

(U/G OF 1ST PETITIONER NATURAL MOTHER)

…PETITIONERS

    (BY SRI. DEPAK.V.BARAD, ADVOCATE)

    AND:

1. SAGAR S/O SUBASH NAVATAKE

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

OCC:REAL ESTATE & AGRI.,

R/O BEHIND ASIAN MALL,

ASIAN GARDENIA A BLOCK,

3RD FLOOR, H.No.S-1,

C/W RPFC No. 200105 of 2023

KALABURAGI-585102.

…RESPONDENT

    (BY SRI. ABDUL MUQTADIR, ADVOCATE)

THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE

    FAIMLY COURTS ACT, BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE REVISION PETITINER, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18.06.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, VIJAYPUR IN CRL.MISC.No.30/2021 AND ENHANCE THE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE FROM Rs.25,000/- PER MONTH TO

PETITIONER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

1. R.P.F.C. No.200003 of 2023 is filed by Sagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the husband’) challenging the order of the Trial Court by which a sum of Rs.25,000/- was awarded as monthly maintenance to his wife— Mrs.Bhagyashree (hereinafter referred to as ‘the wife’) and his son—Shivansh (aged about 04 years) in the proceeding initiated by the wife under Section 125 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. R.P.F.C. No.200105 of 2023 is by the wife seeking for enhancement of the maintenance awarded by the Trial

Court.

3. The factum of the marriage and the birth of Shivansh are not in dispute.

4. The Trial Court, on consideration of the material produced before it, came to the conclusion that Exhibits P- 7 to 32 established that the petitioner owned several pieces of agricultural land in Srinival Saradagi village and Bennur B village, Chitapur Taluk, Amaraga, Killari, Yalli, Budod and Akharai villages. It has also concluded that from the property extracts furnished by the wife, it was clear that the husband hailed from a rich family and was the only son to his parents.

5. The Trial Court has also taken note of the fact that as per the declaration of the husband, he had the educational qualification of a Masters in Business Administration (MBA) degree and was engaged in real estate business. The Trial Court has taken the view that since the husband was an MBA graduate, he could be earning a sum of Rs.50,000/- per month and he may also be getting further sum of Rs.50,000/- per month from his agricultural lands, thereby

making his total income of Rs.1,00,000/-. Thereafter, it has proceeded to award a sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the wife and his minor son.

6. In these petitions, as stated above, both the husband and the wife are before this Court challenging said award. In husband’s petition, this Court directed the husband and the wife to file affidavit of assets and liabilities. The wife has filed her affidavit of assets and liabilities, in which she has stated that she would be having general monthly expenses of Rs.1,00,000/-. She also stated that her 4½ years old son also requires expenses of about Rs.80,000/- per month and she has gone on to state that her son suffered from seizures for which he was admitted in ICU. She has claimed a sum of Rs.80,000/- per month towards the expenditure incurred by her son.

7. The wife also filed a list of 59 properties stated to belong to her husband. She has also stated that the husband was the owner of Suprabhat Infra ventures Pvt. Ltd., Suprabhat Water Park and Srinivas Mangal

Karyalaya, Latur and was owning approximately 300 acres of agricultural land, with a net income of Rs.10,00,000/- per month.

8. Along with the affidavit, the wife has also produced medical records which indicate that the child had behavioural issues and has limited speech and language output and is also suffering from several behavioural traits, such as hand slapping and self harm including biting, head banging. The medical certificate produced would indicate a provisional diagnosis of spoken language disorder is made. She has also produced the MRI (Brain) report, in which it is stated that the child is suffering from ‘mild atrophy of Hippocampus on right side with prominent ipsilateral temporal horn of lateral ventricle’.

9. She also produced the disability registration in respect of her son, wherein it is stated that the child had disability since 2018 and the disability was ‘intellectual’ in nature. A discharge summary has also been produced, in

which it has been stated that child has been diagonsied with right sided unprovoked focal seizures.

10. It is thus clear from the affidavit of assets and liabilities that the wife has to deal with the child who is 4½

years old and is intellectually disabled.

11. The husband has filed his affidavit of assets and liabilities, in which he has stated as follows as regards the disability suffered by his son:

D)Medical details if any, of the Deponent and/or dependant family members:

1. Whether

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top