Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
MR. SAMARTH VIMAL JAGANANI – Appellant
Versus
MRS. ARZOO SAMARTH JAGANANI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and initiation of maintenance proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and malafides. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's refusal to intervene in maintenance order. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's directive for prompt resolution of ongoing proceedings. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:
"a. Wherefore, the Petitioner herein prays that this Honb'le Court be pleased to issue a writ in nature certiorari or any other writ or direction quashing the order dated 1.12.2020 i.e. Annexure- A, passed by the Learned Family Judge Bangalore upon the Application under section 91 of Code of Criminal Procedure in C.Misc No 635 of 2019 and pass such order or direction that this Hon'ble Court deems fit to pass in the facts and circumstances of the case.
b. That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the entire proceedings being the C. Misc 635 of 2019 i.e. Annexure-B pending before the Principal Judge Bangalore."
2. Heard Sri Dinesh D. Tiwari, learned counsel for Sri.Siddharth B. Muchandi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde Nagaraja, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
