Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
H.P.SANDESH, J
JAYAMMA W/O MUNI NARASIMHAIAH – Appellant
Versus
KUMARA Digitally signed D/O LATE MOTAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property ownership and claims. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the will and joint development agreement. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 3. court's analysis on property identification and injunction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 18 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. final decision regarding the injunction and property rights. (Para 32) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. This matter was heard in part earlier and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court ordered to appoint a Court Commissioner to identify the property and the Commissioner has now filed a report before this Court and the same is available on record.
4. In both the plaint as well as in the application, it is contended that plaintiff and one late Motamma are daughters of late Munikadarappa. The defendant No.4-Kuppaswamy and late Ramu defendant No.18, defendant Nos.25 and 29 are sons of late Munikadarappa. The defendant Nos.1, 2, 3 and defendant No.19 are children of late Motamma and grand- children of late Munikadarappa. The defendant No.5 is the wife of defendant No.4, defendant Nos.6, 7, 10, 11 and 12 are the children of defendant No.4. The defendant No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
