IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR J
SHRI. SATHISH HEGDE – Appellant
Versus
DR. B. S. RATHNAKAR – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is filed by the appellant –
complainant challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 26.02.2018 passed in C.C. No. 264/2016 by the Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Thirthahalli, whereunder, the respondent – accused has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short hereinafter referred to as ‘N.I.Act’).
2. Case of the appellant – complainant is that the respondent – accused and the appellant – complainant were friends and they were known to each other. The respondent – accused had borrowed hand loan of Rs.2,00,000/- from the complainant on 13.07.2010 and for making repayment of the said loan amount, he had issued a cheque bearing No.1129464 dated 13.09.2010 for Rs.2,00,000/- drawn on Vijaya Bank, Thirthahalli to the appellant – complainant. The appellant – complainant presented the said cheque for encashment and it came to be dishonoured with shara “funds insufficient” on 15.09.2010. The appellant – complainant got issued legal notice and it came to be served on the respondent – accused. The respondent – accused did not pay the cheque amount and therefore, the appellant – complainant filed a p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.