SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3863

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS, J
SMT M B VANAMALA – Appellant
Versus
MASTER VIHAAN RAGHAV – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:GNANESH H KEMPANNA ,Respondent Advocate:

CAV ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS)

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by Smt.M.B.Vanamala, who is respondent No.1 in the Probate and Succession case in P&SC No.220/2023, aggrieved of the rejection of her application in I.A.No.7 on the file of XII Addl. City Civil Judge at Bengaluru City (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trial Court’ for short) filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. Respondents No.1 and 2 herein filed a petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 , seeking Succession Certificate jointly in the name of the petitioners as well as the first respondent (who is the petitioner herein) in respect of the schedule items which are assets left behind by Sri Raghava Laxmana Gowda, the son of the petitioner herein and father/husband of respondents No.1 and 2 respectively. A prayer is also sought for permanent injunction restraining the other respondents from making any payment to the petitioner herein. The petitioner herein being respondent No.1 before the Trial Court filed an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC, seeking rejection of the petition. The Trial Court dismissed the application and consequently,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top