SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3227

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
VAISHNAVI T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ADBHUTH J KAUSHIK ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following relief:

"Quash the entire proceedings in CC No.22266/2022 arising out of Crime No.50/2022 registered by the Peenya Police Station pending on the file of XXXI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Bengaluru for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860."

2. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that respondent No.2 is the wife of accused No.1 - Devaraju and the petitioner - accused No.2 is alleged to be a paramour of the aforesaid Devaraju. The respondent No.2 filed the instant complaint dated 22.02.2022 pursuant to which an FIR in Crime No.50/2022 was registered as against the petitioner - accused No.2 and the aforesaid Devaraju - accused No.1.

4. In pursuance of the aforesaid complaint, the respondent No.1 - Police Authorities have registered a charge sheet, which is currently pending in C.C.No.22266/2022 before the trial Court. In this context, a perusal of the charge sheet, statement of witnesses, FIR and complaint will clearly indicate that the necessary ingredients constituting offe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top