SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 22959

- 1 -

WP No. 22205 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

WRIT PETITION NO. 22205 OF 2022 (GM-MM-S)

BETWEEN:

1 . SRI L VINAYRAJU

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

NO.122 A AND B BLOCK

NAVELU ROAD, 7TH CROSS

KUVEMPUNAGARA

MYSURU-570001.

2 . M NAGARAJ

SON OF LATE MAYEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS

NO.59, ESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD

DODDAPALYA

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK

MANDYA DISTRICT-571807.

3 . M CHANDRU

SON OF LATE MAYEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

A DODDAPALYA, DODDAPALYA

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK

MANDYA DISTRICT-571807.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. LAKAMAPURMATH CHIDANANDAYYA.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed

by R DEEPA

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

- 2 -

WP No. 22205 of 2022

1 .

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY

TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FOREST

VIDHANA SOUDHA

BENGALURU-560001.

2 .

THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

THE DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

FOR THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD

BENGALURU-560001.

3 .

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

MANDYA DISTRICT

MANDYA-571401.

4 .

THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST

THE DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

AND THE MEMBER SECRETARY

VIDYA NAGAR, FIRST CROSS, MANDYA DISTRICT

MANDYA-571401.

5 .

THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

MANDYA SUB DIVISION

MANDYA-571401.

….RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL

FOR THE RECORDS WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN ISSUING

THE ONLINE ENDORSEMENTS DATED 02/04/2022 ISSUED BY

THE 3RD RESPONDENT/DEPUTY COMMMISSIONER, MANDYA

DISTRICT, MANDYA, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURES-A

TO

A2,

REJECTING

THE

APPLICATION

FOR

DEEMED

CONVERSION OF THE LAND UNDER SECTION 95(9) OF THE

KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING THIS DAY, ASHOK S. KINAGI, J., MADE THE

FOLLOWING:

- 3 -

WP No. 22205 of 2022

The grant of conversion under Section 95(9) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 is automatic upon application and payment of fine, subject to obtaining a lease or license for quarrying or stone crushing activity.

Headnote:

LAND CONVERSION - DEEMED CONVERSION - SECTION 95(9) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 - AUTOMATIC GRANT OF CONVERSION UPON APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FINE - SUBJECT TO OBTAINING LEASE OR LICENSE FOR QUARRYING OR STONE CRUSHING ACTIVITY

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought deemed conversion of their land under Section 95(9) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (the Act of 1964) for industrial and quarrying purposes. The application was rejected by the respondent on the ground that the land was a deemed forest. The petitioners challenged the rejection order, arguing that the grant of conversion under Section 95(9) is automatic upon application and payment of fine.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the grant of permission for diversion of land under Section 95(9) of the Act of 1964 is automatic upon an application being made for diversion along with the fine applicable to the Deputy Commissioner. The court further held that the deemed permission is subject to obtaining a lease or license for quarrying or stone crushing activity, and that the occupant can commence the use of agricultural land for such purposes only when such lease or license is granted.

Issues: Whether the grant of conversion under Section 95(9) of the Act of 1964 is automatic upon application and payment of fine.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the plain language of Section 95(9) of the Act of 1964, which provides that upon application for diversion of agricultural land for quarrying or stone crushing activity and payment of the applicable fine, permission for diversion shall be deemed to have been granted subject to obtaining a lease or license for such activity.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned rejection order, and directed the respondent to communicate the amount of fine payable for conversion to the petitioners within three weeks. Upon payment of the fine, the court directed the respondent to grant deemed conversion of the land as prayed for in the petitioners' application.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 22205 OF 2022 (GM-MM-S)

BETWEEN:

1 . SRI L VINAYRAJU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS NO.122 A AND B BLOCK NAVELU ROAD, 7TH CROSS KUVEMPUNAGARA MYSURU-570001.

2 . M NAGARAJ SON OF LATE MAYEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS NO.59, ESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD DODDAPALYA SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK Digitally signed MANDYA DISTRICT-571807.

by R DEEPA 3 . M CHANDRU Location: High SON OF LATE MAYEGOWDA Court of AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS Karnataka A DODDAPALYA, DODDAPALYA SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571807.

…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LAKAMAPURMATH CHIDANANDAYYA.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FOREST VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001.

2 . THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY THE DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY FOR THE STATE OF KARNATAKA KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU-560001.

3 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571401.

4 . THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST THE DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY AND THE MEMBER SECRETARY VIDYA NAGAR, FIRST CROSS, MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571401.

5 . THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS MANDYA SUB DIVISION MANDYA-571401. ….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN ISSUING THE ONLINE ENDORSEMENTS DATED 02/04/2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/DEPUTY COMMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURES-A TO A2, REJECTING THE APPLICATION FOR DEEMED CONVERSION OF THE LAND UNDER SECTION 95(9) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ASHOK S. KINAGI, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The order, subject matter of challenge in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is of the endorsement dated 02.04.2022, passed by respondent No.3 vide Annexure-A to A2, rejecting the application for deemed conversion of the land under Section 95(9) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short ‘the Act of

1964’), has been rejected.

2. The petitioners are claiming to be the owners of land in Sy.No.18 of Neelanakoppalu Village, Shrirangapattana Taluk. The said land in Sy.No.18 was never treated as a forest land at any point of time earlier. The Tahsildar of Shrirangapattana Taluk granted land to Sri M.Nagaraj S/o Mayegowda on 05.06.1997 and also to M.Chandru i.e., petitioner Nos.2 and 3. Petitioner Nos.2 and 3, as the owners of the land, made an application for phodi and durasti work. After phodi, the land in Sy.No.18 was granted to petitioner Nos.2 and 3 was renumbered as Sy.Nos.82 and 83 of Neelanakoppalu Village, Shrirangapattana Taluk, Mandya District. Petitioner No.1 with a view to obtain the quarrying licence under the provisions of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 (for short ‘the Rules of 1994’) submitted an application in the prescribed form and petitioner No.1 also made an application for issuance of licence for establishment of the stone crusher unit in the Sy.No.82 to an extent of 1 acre. In pursuance to the application submitted by the petitioner, the revenue authority and the forest department issued NOC under Rule 8(5) of the Rules of 1994 for grant of quarrying licence in favour of the petitioners. The petitioners with a view to obtain the conversion of the land under Section 95(9) of the Act of 1964 submitted an application to respondent No.3 seeking conversion of the schedule properties for industrial and quarrying purposes. Respondent No.3 has rejected the said application. Hence, this writ petition.

3. The respondents have the filed the statement of objections contending that originally the land in Sy.Nos.82 and 83/1 was a Government land and the said lands were granted in favour of the different grantees. It is submitted that the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top