HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KRISHNA S DIXIT
SRI M JAIRAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
Petitioner is knocking at the doors of writ court with
the following prayer:
"(a) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus
directing
the
respondents
that
in
lieu
of
withdrawal direct the BDA to allot one plot/ stray
plot in Banashankara stages, 4, 5 and 6 and
Arkavathi layouts, bangalore and execute the
lease cum sale agreement or sale deed directing
the respondent BDA to receive the entire
consideration together with interest, i.e., at the
cost of his earlier allotment of Plot No.444, as
the cancellation is contrary statutory provisions
of BDA Act from the petitioner;"
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently
argues that his client belongs to Schedule Caste and that he
was offered a site vide Allotment Letter dated 21.02.2003;
however he had great financial difficulty and therefore, he
could not make payment in terms of the condition
incorporated in the Allotment Letter; in view of that, his
3
client has withdrawn the amount deposited by way of initial
payment. That being the position, the Court should ask the
BDA to show the mercy, regard being had to multiple
attempts he has made for securing a one single site.
Learned counsel heavily banks upon the proviso to Rule 13
of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.