SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1005

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
SHRI RAJEEV DAMODAR JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ANIRUDH R J NAYAK ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

(a) A writ of certiorari, or a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari and set aside the order-in-original vide No. BEL/EXCUS/000/BEL/CITY/AC/GS/66/2022-23 dated 19-07-2022, enclosed as Annexure-G passed by respondent no.2 as bad in law and (b) Issue a writ of certiorari, or a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari and to hold that the order-in-original NO. BEL/EXCUS/000/BEL/CITY/AC/GS/66/2022-23 dated 19-07-2022, passed by assistant commissioner CTCE, Belagavi (respondent no.2) enclosed as Annexure-G was passed without the authority of law and (c) Issue a writ of mandamus or a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ mandamus by ordering the respondent no. 2 to not to collect or demand any tax, interest and penalty from the petitioner.

2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the lis in the matter is covered by a Judgment of the coordinate bench of this Court dated

03.07.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.11154 of 2023 (T-IT) and connected matters.

3. The learned counsel for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top