SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 27525

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
MR V SATHISH @ KRISHNA SATHISH – Appellant
Versus
MRS SARASWATHI – Respondent


1.

This appeal is directed against the impugned order

dated 05.11.2022 passed in FDP No.70/2022 by the LXIX

Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (for short “the

Trial Court”), whereby the said petition filed by respondent No.1

under Order 20 Rule 18 r/w. 151 CPC was allowed by directing

drawing up of final decree by allotting ground floor of the suit

schedule property in favour of respondent No.1 and first floor in

favour of the appellant.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned

counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

- 3 -

3.

The material on record discloses that respondent No.1

instituted a suit in O.S.No.3564/2020 against the respondents for

partition and separate possession of her share in the suit schedule

property. In the said suit, respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein were

arrayed as defendant Nos.1 and 2 and they are none other than

siblings of the appellant. The appellant and respondent Nos.1 and

2 had one more brother, Sri. Srinivas, who expired and respondent

Nos.3 and 4 are the wife and daughter of said Srinivas. In the said

suit filed by the appellant herein, respondent No.1-defendant No.2

not only contested the suit,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top