Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. Nataraj, J
TUSKER MARK REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR K. KRISHNAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
ALPINE LEISURE HOLIDAYS REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR ANIL KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement reached between parties resolving the dispute. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court acknowledges the application for compounding offenses. (Para 3) |
| 3. court orders acquittal of petitioners based on settlement. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
The petitioners have challenged the judgment of conviction dated 10.01.2019 passed by the LVII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru City in C.C.No.56190/2015 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequent sentence to pay fine of Rs.16,01,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year. The petitioner has also called in question the judgment dated 20.04.2022 passed by the XIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bengaluru (CCH-22) in Crl.A.No.25036/2019 by which, the judgment of conviction and the consequent sentence passed by the Trial Court was upheld.
2. When this revision petition is listed for orders, the parties have settled the dispute and have filed an application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 , in terms of which, the petitioners and the respondent have resolved to settle the dispute at
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
