Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI.D.MUNIRAJU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land in sy.nos. 60 to 64 (Para 3) |
| 2. karimsab purchased the land (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. lands did not belong to forest department (Para 8) |
| 4. once a forest it is always a forest (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. the story in the case (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. dispute about the boundary (Para 13) |
CAV ORDER
The petitioners are calling in question an order dated
19-12-2014 passed by the 2nd respondent/Chief Conservator of Forests-Appellate Authority in Appeal No.135 of 2008 affirming the order dated 09-09-2008 passed by the 3rd respondent/Assistant Conservator of Forests in FOC No.142/2006-07 declaring the lands belonging to the petitioners to be forest lands.
2. Facts adumbrated are as follows:- The averment in the petition is that the petitioners are brothers in relation and are owners of land in Sy. Nos. 60 to 63 of Mylasandra Village, KengeriHobli, Bangalore South Taluk totally measuring 19 acres 35 guntas. It is the case of the petitioners that Sy.No.26 of Mylasandra Village originally measured 91 acres and 02 guntas and after Phodi which took place on 29-06-1869 it is divided into 30 acres and 22 guntas each. Among 6 survey numbers carved out of Sy.No.26 as Survey Nos.59 t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
