PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
THE CHAIRMAN – Appellant
Versus
SRI MOHAMMED NAZRULLA SHERIFF – Respondent
This appeal is filed by the defendant – Bangalore
Development Authority (‘for short, ‘the BDA’) under
Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code challenging the
judgment and decree dated 29.09.2006 passed by the IX
Additional
City
Civil
Judge,
Bangalore,
in
O.S.No.3039/1991, whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff
has been decreed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are
referred to as per their rankings before the trial court.
3. The case of the plaintiff is that he was in peaceful
possession of the suit schedule property bearing No. i.e.,
sites bearing No.30, 31, 39 and 40 in Sy.No.30/3,
Nagawara main road, Bangalore. The further case of the
plaintiff is that he has purchased the property from the
- 3 -
absolute owner, i.e., defendant No.1, by an Agreement
Deed dated 10.05.1984. From the date of agreement he
is in the possession of the property and he has put up a
building. It is his further case that the said property which
was acquired has been de-notified on 27.12.1984. On
16.01.1991 and 14.05.1991 the defendant – BDA tried to
demolish the super structure built on the suit schedule
property. Hence, plaintiff filed a suit for injunction
restraining
t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.