SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 36845

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
MR MOOSA KALEEMULLA KHAN – Appellant
Versus
MRS NAGMA NIKATH – Respondent
WP 10904 of 2024



Petitioner Advocates:SUHAS T L ,Respondent Advocate:

The court upheld the validity of a settlement reached through mediation, quashing ongoing proceedings and emphasizing the importance of amicable resolutions in family law disputes.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 506 and 498A - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Proceedings quashed due to settlement between parties - The parties entered into a memorandum of settlement under Section 89 of CPC, resolving their disputes amicably, including custody of the minor child and waiving claims for maintenance and property. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Mediation - The court recognized the settlement reached through mediation and disposed of the case in accordance with the agreement, emphasizing the importance of amicable resolutions in family disputes. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner and respondent, married in 2013, have been living separately since 2015 due to irreconcilable differences and have one minor child. They agreed to dissolve their marriage and settle custody and maintenance issues amicably.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the settlement and quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, allowing the parties to move forward without further claims against each other.

Issues: The main issue was the amicable resolution of disputes between the parties and the implications of the settlement on ongoing legal proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the settlement reached through mediation is valid and should be honored, allowing the parties to resolve their disputes without further litigation.

Result: Writ Petition is disposed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition disposed (Para 4)

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner calls in question the proceedings in C.C.No.577/2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 506 and 498A of the IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 .

2. Heard Sri. Suhas T.L., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Nagaraj G., learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, Sri. B.N. Jagadeesha, learned Addl.SPP, appearing for respondent No.2 and have perused the material on record.

3. During the pendency of these proceedings, it transpires that the parties to the lis have entered into a settlement and the memorandum of settlement reads as follows:

"MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF CPC READ WITH RULES 24 AND 25 OF THE KARNATAKA CIVIL PROCEDURE (MEDIATION) KULES, 2005.

The parties above named beg to submit as follows:-

I. The aforesaid petition was referred to mediation for resolving the dispute between the parties. In the course of mediation, they have resolved their dispute and have agreed to the following terms and conditions:

1. The plaintiff has filed the above petition Under Order 7 Rule 1 of C.P.C. R/W Sec.2 (TV) & (VIII) (a) of Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939 between the plaintiff and defendant solemnized on 22.09.2013 at Masjid-E- Ismabad, Palace, Basavanagudi, Bangalore as per Muslim rites and customs.

2. Both the parties state that from the wedlock, they have one son by name Mohammed Ibrahim Khan aged about 7 years. The minor son is presently under the care and custody of the mother/plaintiff.

3. That the parties herein due to irreconcilable differences between them and due to incompatibility of temperaments, have been living separately from 2015 and thus they are unable to lead a married life. As such they have agreed to get their marriage dissolved on the following terms.

4. It is agreed between the parties that the care and custody of the minor child shall be with the petitioner/mother for all purposes and she will be the legal guardian of the minor child. The defendant shall not exercise visitation rights over the minor child.

5. Both the parties agree that they shall have no claims with regard to maintenance/permanent alimóny against each other.

6. Both the parties agree that they shall have no claims with regard to movable or immovable property belonging to each other.

7. The plaintiff agrees to withdraw Cri.Misc.813/2018 filed by her against the defendant for maintenance pending before the V Addl. Judge. Family Court al Bengaluru.

8. The plaintiff agrees to co-operate/close C.C.No. 577/2016 filed by her against the defendant under section 498A pending before VI ACMM., at Bengaluru.

9. Both the parties agree that they shall not interfere in the lives of each other in future.

II. In view of the aforesaid agreement entered into between the parties, the parties pray that this Court be pleased to dispose of the above case in terms of the aforesaid agreement.

III. Parties will appear on 15.06.2023 before the Court for passing orders in terms of the agreement."

4. In light of the settlement arrived at between the parties as afore-quoted, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. Writ Petition is disposed.

ii. Proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.577/2016 pending before the XI ACJM, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru, stands quashed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top