SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 37101

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
MS S M NANJAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHASILDAR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:S R SREEPRASAD ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL JUDGMENT

Challenging judgment and decree dated 15.01.2023 passed by Addl. District Judge, Chikkamagalur, in R.A.no.21/2007 and judgment and decree dated 22.02.2007 passed by Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & Prl. JMFC., Tarikere, in O.S.no.108/2005, this appeal is filed.

2. Brief facts as stated are that, O.S.no.108/2005 was filed by plaintiff seeking for declaration. In plaint, it was stated he was owner in possession and enjoyment of suit properties named in schedule which were ancestral properties belonging to one Maheshwarappa son of Rudrappa. In family partition, they were allotted to share of plaintiff and his name mutated in revenue records. It was further stated during time of Maheshwarappa, there were objections about encroachment of tank-bed area of Kammaranakatte in Sy.no.14 of Duglapura. Defendant no.1 i.e., Tahsildar, Tarikere taluk had ordered eviction from encroached area. Said order was challenged before Assistant Commissioner in R.A.no.29/87-88. Appeal was dismissed, but questioned before Deputy Commissioner, Chikkamagaluru, in RA no.24/88-89 which was allowed by remanding matter back to Assistant Commissioner with directions. Thereafter Assistant Commissioner once again

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top