Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
SRI VEERAPANDI A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identity and religious reconversion impact on caste. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. need to change school records post reconversion. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. jurisdiction of civil court regarding caste declarations. (Para 11 , 12 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. case background and context concerning caste recognition. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. relevant judicial principles on maintaining civil rights. (Para 31 , 34 , 37) |
| 6. fundamental rights to recognize caste. (Para 51 , 52) |
| 7. outcome of appeal and remand for consideration. (Para 54) |
CAV JUDGMENT
2. For the purpose of convenience and easy reference, rank of the parties is referred to as per their status before the trial Court.
The 1st plaintiff is Hindu by birth and his name was Veerapandi A., and he solemnized marriage with the 2nd plaintiff who was a Muslim by religion and after the marriage, the 1st plaintiff embraced Islam religion by changing his name as Vasim Khan. The 3rd and 4th plaintiffs are two children of plaintiff Nos.1 and 2. The 3rd plaintiff born on 11.05.2007 and 4th plaintiff born on04.01.2009.
5. It is further case of the plaintiffs that the 3rd and 4th plaintiffs are studying at primary school in the 4th defendant’s school. At the time o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
