Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI PRAJWAL REVANNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY KARNATAKA BY CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding document access. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of document provision. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. final conclusion on document access. (Para 8) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard Sri Arun G, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Sri Jagadeesha B N., learned Additional State Public Prosecutor, appearing for respondent No.1.
4. Learned counsel Sri Arun G appearing for the petitioner would vehemently contend that the investigating officer investigating crime No.107 of 2024 has communicated to the Director, State FSL to conduct forensic examination on articles seized and therefore, the said articles which were given for examination should be made available to him in its entirety. He would seek to place reliance upon the judgment rendered by the Apex Court interpreting Section 207 of the Cr.P.C.
6. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties and have perused the material on record.
“APPLICATION UNDER SEC.207 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
1. The complainant/ investigation agency have filed the final report in the above case by citing alleged offence
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
