IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD, J
S.p. Chidanand S/o Sri. S.r. Puttaswamaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 22643 OF 2024 (LB-RES)
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has commenced plotted development in an extent measuring 2 acres 09 guntas in Sy No. 46/5, 50/3, 46/1, 46/3 and 50/2 of Guluru Village and Hobli, Tumakuru Taluk. This development, for convenience, is referred to as ‘the Project’, and this extent of 2 acres and 09 guntas is referred to as the ‘Subject Property’. The Second respondent – the Tumakuru Urban Development Authority ['the Planning Authority'] has accorded Provisional Approval under section 17 [2-A] of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 [the KTCP Act] and then issued the Work Order dated 21.08.2023 [Annexure - B] permitting commencement of the Project. However, the Planning Authority has not issued the Final Approval under section 17 [2-B] of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 [the KTCP Act].
2. The Planning Authority has issued the impugned Endorsement dated 28.02.2024 [Annexure - G] calling upon the petitioner to register the Project with the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority [the fourth respondent and referred to as ‘the Regulatory Authority’] and then apply for Final Approval under section 17 [2-B] of the KTCP Act. The Planning Authority has issued this Endorsement because the Regulatory Authority has addressed Communication dated 20.02.2024 [Annexure - H]. The Regulatory Authority, by this Communication, has informed the Planning Authority:
[a] that every Real estate project involving construction which is in excess of 500 square meters [or 8 units] and involves plot development must be compulsorily registered under the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 [for short, the Real Estate Act], and
[b] that the condition that the Real estate project must be registered under the Real Estate Act must be incorporated in the Provisional Approval and the Final Approval should not be granted under unless a real estate project is registered.
The petitioner has called in question the Endorsement dated 28.2.2024 [Annexure – G] and the Communication dated 20.02.2024 [Annexure – H].
3. The petitioner's grievance with these impugned Endorsement and Communication is because of the stipulation that Final Approval under KTCP Act shall not be granted unless his Project is registered under the provisions of the Real Estate Act. This grievance is premised in the assertion that the Real Estate Act does not stipulate that a Planning Authority must withhold approval [Final Approval] under Section 17[2-B] of the KTCP Act for a project until the concerned real estate project is registered under Section 3 thereof even if the proponent has completed such project from out of its own funds without marketing/ selling [or offering to sell] any part of the Project and proposes to market/sell [or offer to sell] only after registering such project under the Real Estate Act.
4. A brief statement of the facts: As first mentioned, the Planning Authority has accorded Provisional Approval for the Project under section 17[2-A] of the KTCP Act on 01.07.2023,
[i] An Engineer with the concerned Zilla Panchayat: This Engineer has addressed the Communication dated 05.02.2024 to the Planning Authority confirming that the petitioner has completed the execution of laying water pipes and sewage lines [Annexure – C].
[ii] The Development Officer of the concerned Town Panchayat. This Officer has issued Endorsement dated 07.02.2024 listing the works completed by the petitioner including the works such as constructing fence
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.