Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
N S SANJAY GOWDA: J
VIJAYANAGARA 4TH STAGE SENIOR CITIZEN WELFARE ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge notifications regarding municipal jurisdiction changes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners seek clearance certificates for properties from muda. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. muda's responsibilities and authority under the kuda act clarified. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. criteria for constituting smaller urban areas outlined in km act. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. objections must align with km act criteria for urban area designation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. petitioners' concerns about service quality and property value addressed. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 7. no legal right to demand specific municipal jurisdiction. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. government's discretion in urban area designation upheld. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 9. writ petitions dismissed; responsibilities for property assessment clarified. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The petitioner is challenging the notification dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 357 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act , 1976 (for short, ‘the KM Act’), by which Hinkal Gram Panchayat has been included within the small urban area, which has been specified as the City Municipal Council (“CMC”) ar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
