Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
KALANDAR SHAFI S/O LATE ISMMAIL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the learned additional state public prosecutor (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. i have given my anxious consideration (Para 8) |
| 3. the phraseology of the words (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. for the aforesaid reasons (Para 15) |
CAV ORDER
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Both these petitions call in question a solitary order dated 04-12-2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (III Court) Mangalore, by which the Court rejects the requisition of the prosecution for grant of Police custody of the accused. Writ Petition No.33526 of 2024 is preferred by the complainant and Criminal Petition No. 13459 of 2024 is preferred by the State.
2. Heard Sri P.P. Hegde, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in the writ petition No.33526 of 2024; Sri B N Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor appearing for petitioner in Criminal Petition No.13459 of 2024 and for respondent No.1 in writ petition No.33526 of 2024; Sri B.Lethif, learned counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 4 in writ petition and respondents 1 and 3 in Criminal Petition and Sri Hasmath Pasha, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.3 in Writ Petition and respondent No.2 in Criminal Petition.
3
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
