ORAL ORDER

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned HCGP for respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for respondent No.2.

2. The factual matrix of case of the prosecution before the Trial Court based on the complaint given by the revision petitioner is that a case is registered, wherein an allegation is made that on 07.11.2005, C.W.1 came to the Court of Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramanagaram to give evidence in C.C.No.17/1996 and after giving evidence at 3.45 p.m., when he was going outside the Court near Forest Office, the accused intimidated the complainant to end his life by causing accident with a car, since he had given evidence against the accused. Therefore, complaint was given by C.W.1 and invoked offence under Section 506 IPC , investigated the matter and filed the charge-sheet.

3. The statement of accused was recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and accused denied the charges. Hence, the prosecution examined the witnesses as P.Ws.1 to 5, P.W.1 is the complainant, P.Ws.2 and 3 are eye witnesses and P.Ws.4 and 5 are the Investigating Officer, who have received the complaint and investigated the matter and filed the charge- sheet.

4. The Trial Court having considered the evid