SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3285

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH, J
S. NOORA AHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:LAKSHMIKANTH K ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional SPP appearing for the respondent-State.

2. This Court had earlier rejected the bail petition filed by this petitioner vide order dated 04.01.2022 in Crl.P.No.9869/2021 at the crime stage. However, liberty was given to the petitioner to approach this Court after filing of the charge-sheet. Now, the police have completed the investigation and filed the charge-sheet.

3. The main accusation made against this petitioner is that this petitioner entered into a mortgage with the victim and paid an amount of Rs.7 lakhs in respect of the site which was allotted to the victim. When the petitioner came to know about the further mortgage with C.W.46, he demanded money and the victim sought time and when she did not pay the amount, C.W.2 agreed to repay the amount and took time. When C.W.2 also did not pay the amount, this petitioner quarreled with him and at that time, accused No.1 came and pacified the issue and accused No.1 took C.W.2, accused No.2 and C.W.17 to the son of local MLA and the matter was compromised to pay an amount of Rs.8,50,000/- to accused No.2 i.e., the petitioner herein and also to pay an amoun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top