Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J
MRS. ANUPAMA H.G. – Appellant
Versus
CARMEL GRANITE AND CRUSHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court evaluates the validity of partnerships in the context of unregistered status and its implications for legal proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. discussions on the necessity of amending pleadings to reflect true capacities and ensure justice. (Para 5) |
| 3. court emphasizes consistency in findings and the basis for allowing amendments post-trial commencement. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The respondent herein has filed a suit for recovery of money as the partner of Carmel Granite and Crushers, represented by the plaintiff as its partner. It is the case of the plaintiff/respondent that there was an agreement between the plaintiff and defendant for quarrying the granite stones. As per the agreement dated 12.06.2008, it is between Mrs. Anupama H. G. and Mr. Roque Ronald Pinto, partner of Carmel Granite and Crushers and it is signed by both Mrs. Anupama H. G. and partner of Carmel Granite and Crushers. In view of the disputes between the parties, a notice was issued calling upon the defendant to make payment of the amount due to it and when the defendant failed to return the amount, the present suit for recovery is filed. The suit is of the year 2016. In the year 2017 i.e.,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
