Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
C.M. POONACHA, J
Revanasiddaiah S/o Late Siddalingaiah – Appellant
Versus
Janatha Seva Co-operative Bank Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner terminated and reinstated (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's claims for benefits (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's consideration of claims (Para 8) |
| 4. reinstatement does not imply entitlement (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 5. writ petition partly allowed (Para 54 , 55) |
CAV ORDER
“(a) a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing the order dated 30.11.2015 passed by the 2nd respondent in Case No.ARB-C:45:CEP:578:2014-15 produced as Annexure-K, the order dated 3.10.2016 passed by the 3rd respondent in Case No.DRB-C/Appeal 03/2015-16 produced as Annexure-L and the order dated 29.7.2017 passed by the 4th respondent in case No.CO:30:CAP:2016 certified copy of which is produced as Annexure-M respectively.
2. The relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present petition are that, the petitioner was working as an Assistant Manager in the first respondent – bank when he was terminated on 2.9.1998. Being aggrieved, the petitioner challen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
