Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR R. NATARAJ, J
SMT. CHANDRAKALA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging prosecution based on jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the nature of the power of attorney. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's stance on maintainability and jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. requirement for proper representation in court. (Para 14) |
| 5. directions for the trial court's consideration. (Para 16) |
ORDER
The petitioner has challenged the prosecution launched against her by respondent No.1 in C.C.No.6701/2019 pending trial before the IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Nrupatuga Road, Bangalore City for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 418, 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B read with 34 of IPC.
2. A private complaint was lodged by respondent No.2 herein in PCR No.10136/2018 alleging the commission of cognizable offences by the petitioner and others. He alleged that the property bearing No.97 situated at TATA Silk Form, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru belonged to his father. He claimed that the petitioner herein and he were the two children who succeeded to aforesaid property, upon the death of their father on 18.10.2015. He alleged that the property was entrusted to accused No.2, who is the husband of the petitione
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
