2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 16688
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.200085/2021
BETWEEN:
PRABHUDDA @ AKHIL S/O BABURAO KAMBLE
AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
R/O MAHADEVI COLONY, SHIVAPUR ROAD,
BASAVAKALYAN, DIST. BIDAR-585327
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI SHIVALING N. PADSHETTY, &
SRI SHANKAR GOUDA.M, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE STATE THROUGH
STATION BAZAR P.S.,
REPRESENTED BY ADDL. S.P.P.
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI-585105.
… RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.MAYA.T.R, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED
UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.08.2021 PASSED BY
2
THE I ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KALABURAGI
IN CRL. APPEAL NO.04/2020 AND ALSO ORDER DATED
10.12.2019 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
KALABURAGI IN C.C. 1877/2014 AND DIRECT THE
PETITIONER BE ACQUITTED OF THE OFFENCES ALLEGED
AGAINST HIM.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Heard Sri Shivaling N. Padshetty, learned counsel
for the revision petitioner and Smt. Maya T.R., learned
High Court Government Pleader.
2.
This Revision Petition is filed by the
accused under Section 397 read with section 401 of
Cr.P.C., with the following prayer.:
“Hence it is prayed that the Hon'ble court
may pleased to call for the records of lower
Courts
and
set
aside
the
order
dated
13/08/2021 passed by the I Addl. Dist. &
Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in Crl. Appeal No.
04/2020 and also order dated 10/12/2019
3
passed by the Prl. Civil Judge and J.M.F.C.,
Kalaburagi in C.C.No.1877/2014 and direct the
petitioner be acquitted of the offences alleged
against him, in the interest of justice and
equity.”
3.
Brief facts of the case for disposal of the
petition are as under:
Complainant being the Executive in Blue Dart
Courier Company Limited was dealing in the business
of delivering parcels/courier to its customers. They
were
dispatching
valuable
articles
which
were
purchased by the customers through online shopping
basis. On 16.01.2014, at about 5.00 p.m., as usual
outlet of the company was closed and the staff
members after locking the shutters went to their
houses. However, there were several shopping articles
like mobile phones, laptops, clothes etc., kept in the
office premises which were to be delivered to the
concerned
buyers
worth
Rs.8,13,717/-.
On
4
17.01.2014
at
about
8.40a.m.,
as
usual
the
complainant and other employees came to the office
premises and noticed that somebody had broke open
the locks put on to the shutters and by removing
shutters stolen away the valuables which were kept on
the previous day. After noticing the same, the
Executive of the Blue Dart Courier lodged a complaint
with
the
jurisdictional
police
and
police
after
registering the case investigated the matter and filed
the charge sheet against the accused for the offences
punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC.
4.
On receipt of the charge sheet, learned
Magistrate took cognizance of the aforesaid offences
and after securing the presence of the accused,
charges were framed. Accused pleaded not guilty,
hence trial was held.
5
5.
In order to prove its case, the prosecution
examined 9 witnesses as P.Ws.1 to 9 and relied on 7
documentary
evidences
which
are
marked
and
exhibited at Ex.P.1 to P.7. Stolen articles were seized
by the Investigating Officer during the course of
investigation from the custody of the accused which
were also produced before the learned Magistrate and
marked and exhibited as M.Os.1 to 56.
6.
On conclusion of the recording of evidence,
the trial Magistrate recorded the statement of the
accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., wherein
accused denied all the incriminating materials found
against him in the case of the prosecution. Accused
did not offer any explanation in writing as is
contemplated under Section 313 (5) of Cr.P.C.
7.
Thereafter, learned Magistrate heard the
parties in detail and after considering the material on
6
record in a judicious manner, convicted and sentenced
the accused as under:
“Accused is sentenced for the rigorous
imprisonment of 2 years for the offence
punishable U/Sec.457 IPC and he shall pay fine
amount of Rs.10.000/-.
Accused is further sentenced for the
rigorous imprisonment of 2 years for the
offence punishable U/Sec.380 IPC and he shall
pay fine amount of Rs.10,000/-.
The
imprisonment
for
the
offences
punishable U/Secs. 457 and 380 IPC shall run
concurrently to Accused.
Out of the fine amount recovered from
the accused, Rs.5,000/- shall be defrayed to
the expenses of the State.
The
remaining
fine
amount
of
Rs.15,000/- recovered from the Accused shall
be paid to the P.W.1 (first informant).
In default of payment of fine, the
accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for
7
3 months each for the offences under Section
457 and 380 IPC.”
8.
Being aggrieved by the said judgment of
conviction, accused preferred an appeal before the
I-Additional District and Sessions Court in Criminal
Appeal No