SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1195

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI, J
GANGADHAR S/O DEVALEPPA LAMANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 100467 of 2025



Petitioner Advocates:AVINASH BANAKAR ,Respondent Advocate:

Bail granted despite serious allegations due to the simplicity of injuries and familial relationship, with stringent conditions to mitigate risks.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(4), 74, 76, 64, 62, 352, and 351(3) - Petition for regular bail - Accused charged with multiple offences including attempt to rape and assault - Nature of injuries sustained by complainant deemed simple - Delay in filing complaint raised concerns of potential fabrication - Conditions imposed to mitigate risks of tampering with witnesses. (Paras 1, 10, 11)

(B) Bail Considerations - While the nature of the allegations is serious, the court acknowledged the relationship between the parties and the simplicity of the injuries as factors warranting bail - The court emphasized the need for stringent conditions to ensure compliance and protect the integrity of the investigation. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of assaulting and threatening the complainant, related to a dispute over livestock. The complaint was filed two days post-incident, raising questions about its validity.

Findings of Court:
The court found the nature of the offences to be heinous but considered the injuries were simple and the relationship between the parties.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to bail considering the nature of the offences and the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that despite the serious nature of the allegations, the simplicity of the injuries and the familial relationship between the parties justified granting bail, subject to stringent conditions.

Result: Petition allowed; bail granted subject to conditions.

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI)

This petition is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNS S’) for grant of regular bail in Crime no.11/2025 by Hansabhavi Police Station, Haveri district for offences punishable under Sections 115(2) , 126(2) , 329(4), 74, 76, 64, 62 , 352 and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNS’ for short) by sole accused (petitioner).

2. Sri Avinash Banakar, learned counsel for petitioner submitted, case of prosecution was that Smt.Laxmi filed complaint at 5:00 p.m. on 17.01.2025, stating that she was residing with her husband at Bavapur, Hirekerur taluk, where they did coolie work and chicken farming for livelihood. On 12.01.2025, petitioner had beaten one hen injuring its leg. When complainant questions same, petitioner abused her by stating, if they entered his land, he would do same and threatened her for questioning him.

3. At about 1:00 p.m. on 15.01.2025, when complainant was sitting infront of her house, petitioner came there and suddenly pulled her by her hair and abused her by stating that if her chicken entered in land, he would injure them. He pulled her inside house, close door and after uttering threat to rape her, he pulled at her Nighty tearing it. When she screamed, he began beating her on her cheek, ear, chest and back. He also lifted and threw her on floor causing injury to her waist, due to which she was lying down. Hearing her cries, Kavya (brother-in-law’s wife) arrived there, opened door, diffused situation and saved her. At that time petitioner left threatening her, though she was saved, he would not leave her. Shortly, Anand Lamani (brother-in-law) arrived. She called her husband who was in Byadagi, informed him about incident and asked him to come back.

4. It was further stated, after her husband came back and was taking her on his motorcycle to Hirekerur Hospital for treatment, petitioner followed them on his motorcycle. He blocked them near Tavaragi Halla and threatened to kill them and not allow them to survive in village, in case they filed police complaint. Thereafter, they went to Hirekerur Government Hospital, took treatment. As per advise, she went to Shikaripur Hospital in ambulance for higher treatment, and was under treatment as inpatient. Alleging that petitioner had committed offences of assault, attempt to rape etc., she filed complaint. Based on same, Crime no.11/2025 was registered Hansabhavi Police Station.

5. It was submitted, as per complaint, incident occurred on 15.01.2025, but complaint was filed only on 17.01.2025, belatedly with sole intention to implicate petitioner and harass him. It was submitted complainant and accused were relatives i.e. brother and sister ruling out probability of rape. For said reason, allegation of outraging modesty would also be farfetched. It was also submitted injury sustained being simple would also indicate that petitioner was falsely implicated and got arrested on 17.01.2025. It was submitted, petitioner was law 36 year old agriculturist and permanent resident of Bavapur village and would not jump bail. Hence, prayed for granting bail on any conditions.

6. On other hand Smt.Girija S. Hiremath, learned HCGP opposed petition. At outset and even though nature of injuries as per treatment records was simple, same would not mitigate gravity of offences as they were committed against woman. It was submitted, there were specific overt act against petitioner mentioned in complaint, for abusing, threatening and attempting to rape her, which were heinous in nature. Moreover, investigation was in progress and if bail were granted, petitioner was likely to threaten prosecution witnesses and hamper investigation. On above grounds sought for rejection.

7. Heard learned counsel and perused material available on record.

8. From above, only point that would arise for consideration is:

“Whether petitioner is entitled for grant of regular bail on condition?

9. This petition is for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top