SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 17228

MFA No.202347 OF 2018

C/W

MFA No.200228 OF 2019

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

MFA No.202347 OF 2018 (MV-I)

C/W

MFA No.200228 OF 2019 (MV-I)

IN MFA No.202347 OF 2018

BETWEEN:

HARISH J

S/O JAYARAO @ SHAHAPURKAR

AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: LAB TECHNICIAN

R/O H.NO.3-3-96 GANGA NIVAS,

BEROON GALLI, RAICHUR,

NOW AT EWS-@-29, ADARSH NAGAR,

KALABURAGI

...APPELLANT

(BY SRI. B M KINIKERI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

102, 1ST FLOOR R.K. COMPLEX K.C. ROAD,

BELLARY, THROUGH ITS LEGAL MANAGER

IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INS CO. LTD,

ASIAN ARCADE S.B. TEMPLE ROAD,

KALABURAGI - 585 102

... RESPONDENT

(BY SMT. PREETI PATIL MELKUNDI, ADVOCATE)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF M.V. ACT,

PRAYING TO JUDGMENT AND AWARDED DATED 31.10.2018

PASSED BY PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT AT

KALABURAGI IN MVC NO.708/2017 MAY KINDLY BE MODIFIED

AND THE TOP NOTED APPEAL MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED AND

MFA No.202347 OF 2018

C/W

MFA No.200228 OF 2019

2

AWARD THE COMPENSATION AS PRAYED IN THE CLAIM

PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

IN MFA No.200228 OF 2019

BETWEEN:

IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INS. CO. LTD.,

102, 1ST FLOOR R.K. COMPLEX K.C. ROAD,

BELLARY, THROUGH ITS LEGAL MANAGER

IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INS CO. LTD,

ASIAN ARCADE S.B. TEMPLE ROAD,

KALABURAGI - 585 101

(NOW REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED

SIGNATORY, BENGALURU)

...APPELLANT

(BY SMT. PREETI PATIL MELKUNDI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

HARISH J

S/O JAYARAO @ SHAHAPURKAR

AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: LAB TECHNICIAN

R/O H.NO.3-3-96 GANGA NIVAS,

BEROON GALLI, RAICHUR,

NOW AT EWS-W-29, ADARSH NAGAR,

KALABURAGI-585 101

... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. B M KINIKERI, ADVOCATE)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF M.V. ACT,

PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.10.2018 IN MVC

NO.708/2017 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND

MACT, KALABURAGI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND

EQUITY.

THESE MFAs HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR

JUDGMENT ON 16.02.2023, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT

OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:-

MFA No.202347 OF 2018

C/W

MFA No.200228 OF 2019

3

These two appeals are filed challenging the impugned

judgment and award dated 31.10.2018 in MVC.No.708/2018

on the file of Prl.Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Kalaburagi,

whereby the petition filed under Section 163-A of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘M.V.Act’ for short) came to be partly

allowed granting compensation in a sum of Rs.1,35,200/- with

a direction the respondent to pay the same with interest at

9% p.a.

2.

While MFA.No.202347/2018 is filed by petitioner

seeking enhancement of compensation, MFA.No.200228/2019

is filed by respondent/Insurance Company with a prayer to

dismiss the claim petition.

3.

For the sake of convenience, the parties are

referred to by their rank before the Tribunal.

4.

FACTS: It is the case of the petitioner that on

04.07.2017 at 7.30 a.m, petitioner was proceeding on motor

cycle bearing registration No.KA-32/EN-6249 (‘offending

vehicle’ for short) belonging to him. On Raichur-Gobbur Road,

4

near Kalmal bus stop, accident occurred due to the rash or

negligent driving by the offending vehicle. In the said

accident, he sustained grievous injuries. Immediately, he was

shifted to Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences. Later on he

took treatment at Navodaya Hospital, Raichur. Despite

prolonged treatment, he is not completely cured. He is the

owner of the offending vehicle. It is insured with respondent.

At the time of accident, he was earning Rs.15,000/- p.m as a

Lab Technician. Respondent is liable to pay the compensation

and hence, the petition.

5.

Respondent has appeared through counsel and

filed objections admitting that petitioner is the owner of the

offending vehicle and was insured with the respondent as on

the date of accident. However, petition filed under Section

163-A of the M.V.Act by the petitioner seeking compensation

against respondent is not maintainable. At the time of

accident, petitioner was not holding a valid driving license and

thereby violated the terms and conditions of the policy. The

compensation claimed is highly exorbitant, fanciful and

without any basis. Having regard to the fact that the income

5

of the petitioner was Rs.15,000/- petition under Section 163-A

is not maintainable and prays to dismiss the petition.

6.

Based on these pleadings, the Tribunal has framed

necessary issues.

7.

In support of his case, petitioner has examined

himself as PW-1 and one Dr.Ramakanth Kulkarni who has

issued disability certificate as PW-2. He has relied upon Ex.P1

to 20.

8.

On behalf of respondent one witness is examined

as RW-1 and Ex.R1 and 2 are marked.

9.

Vide the impugned judgment and award, the

Tribunal has partly allowed the claim petition granting

compensation in a sum of Rs.1,35,200/- with interest at 9%

p.a. and directed respondent to pay the same. The details of

compensation granted by the Tribunal is as below:

Head of compensation

Amount in Rs.

Pain, shock and agony

5,000

Medical expenses

15,000

Loss of income towards permanent

disability

1,15,200

TOTAL

1,35,200

6

10.

Seeking

enhancement

of

the

compensation,

petitioner has filed MFA.No.202347/2018 contending that the

compensation granted is on the lower side. The compensation

granted under all the heads is on the lower side. The disability

ought to have been taken at 30-35% to the whole body. The

Tribunal has erred in considering the disability at 16% only. The

Tribunal has also not granted any compensation under the head

diet, attendant charges, extra nourishment, conveyance and loss

of enjoyment. No compensation is granted under the head future

medical expenses. No compensation is granted under the head

loss of amenities of life, loss of income during laid of period,

damages caused to the offending vehicle, loss of marriage

prospects and prays to allow the appeal.

11.

In support of his arguments, learned counsel

appearing for petitioner has relied upon the following decision:

(i)

Chandrakanta Tiwari Vs. New India Assurance

Co.Ltd & Anr. (Chandrakanta Tiwari’s case)1

12.

On the other hand respondent has challenged the

impugne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top