ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court calling in question the tender notifications issued in respect of 28 tenders and has sought certain consequential relief.

2. Heard Smt.Rakshitha D.J., appearing for the petitioners, the learned Senior counsel Sri. Sandesh J. Chouta, representing respondent Nos.2 to 6 and the learned High Court Government Pleader, Sri.Spoorthy Hedge, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 7.

3. The facts, adumbrated are as follows:

The petitioners claim to be a Class-I license contractors in the business of performing the work, for which the contract is now called. It is the case of the petitioners that the second respondent - Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited has notified tender packages on the Karnataka Public Procurement Portal in each division by way of separate notifications. The petitioners have now rushed to this Court calling in question the very act of calling the tender by way of packages, which according to the averments in the petition causes great prejudice to them. It is the case of the petitioners that the tenders to which the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe can participate are called individually and the other tenders are called by way of packa