Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.S.MUDAGAL, ANIL B KATTI, JJ
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY C.P.I KUNDAPURA CIRCLE KUNDAPURA UDUPI DISTRICT-576 201 – Appellant
Versus
ANANDA BHANDARY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the murder incident and initial prosecution case. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. court's observations on evidence and witness credibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 23 , 26 , 27) |
| 3. arguments regarding the credibility of eyewitnesses. (Para 10 , 11 , 20) |
| 4. court's ruling on the trial court's errors leading to acquittal. (Para 30) |
| 5. final decision on appeal and conviction of the respondent. (Para 31) |
JUDGMENT
2. “Whether the impugned order of acquittal passed by the trial Court suffers glaring illegality?” is the question involved in this case.
4. Shankarnarayana police, Kundapura Taluk charge sheeted the accused in Crime No.156/2004 of their Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC .
i) PW.1 is the brother in law of PW.2. Deceased Girija was the close relative of PWs.1 and 2. Since Girija’s husband had died, she was residing with PW.2. The lands of the accused and PW.1 were adjacent to each other. The accused used to live separately from his wife and children in the house situated in his land. The accused used to insist Girija to get food from his wife for him which she declined. Being enraged by that, on 30.11.2004 at 11.30 a.m. when Giri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
