SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 34

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. MUNIYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

Learned HCGP is directed to take notice for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that consequent to the orders of the Committee for regularisation of unauthorized occupation recommending grant of 30 guntas of land in Sy.No.85 of Mindahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Malur Taluk, Kolar District, and a grant certificate being issued on 25.12.1980, the name of the petitioner was entered in the land revenue records and the petitioner has been cultivating the land in question. However after computerisation, the name of the petitioner is missing from the land revenue records. In this regard, the petitioner has made several representations to the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, Mallur Taluk, Kolar District to re- enter the name of the petitioner in the land revenue records. However, no orders have been passed by the respondent-Tahsildar till date and therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 4th respondent-Tahsildar to enter the name of the petitioner in the computerised land revenue records.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned HCGP and on perusing the petition papers, this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top