Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, JJ
Mr. Mazin Abdul Rahman @ Mazin – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail appeal context and background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's lack of involvement assertions. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. discussion on prima facie evidence for accusations. (Para 5 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. conspiracy and preparatory acts classified. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. citations from case law regarding bail. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. conclusion on upholding trial court's decision. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 7. final dismissal of appellant's bail appeal. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by accused No.6 in Spl.Case No.706/2023 on the file of XLIX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, [Special Judge for trial of NIA Cases], (CCH-50), Bengaluru. His application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., was dismissed by order dated 16.10.2023 and hence this appeal under Section 21 (4) of National Investigation Agency Act , 2008.
2. The background is that on 15.8.2022 an FIR in crime no.334/2022 was registered at Doddapete Police Station, Shivamogga in connection with stabbing a person by name Prem Singh. The investigation of this case disclosed terrorist activities by a banned terrorist organization. The investigator made a report of the conspiracy to further t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
