SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 903

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
C M JOSHI, J
MRS. SUNANDA, W/O RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
MR. V SRINIVASA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI V S NARAYANA

Table of Content
1. background on property ownership and familial relations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. issues framed by the court for determination. (Para 6 , 7)
3. court's reasoning on property classification. (Para 8 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. arguments regarding the nature of the property. (Para 9 , 10 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the VII Additional Civil Judge, Bangalore, (CCH 19) in OS No.1743/1997, on 20-02-2006, the plaintiff is before this Court in appeal questioning the share allotted to her.

2. The brief facts that are necessary for the purpose of this appeal are that:

The plaintiff happens to be the daughter of Venkatanarasappa and Padmavathamma. Apart from Padmavathamma, Venkatanarasappa had two other wives by name Susheelamma and Shamalamma. Venkatanarasappa died intestate on 10-4-1974 leaving behind him Nagarathnamma, daughter from first wife- Susheelamma; plaintiff and defendants No.1 and 2 from the second wife i.e. defendant No.3 Padmavathamma; and one Manjunatha from his third wife-Shamalamma. After the death of Venkatanarasappa, the children of three wives of Venkatanarasappa entered into a registered partition and divided the property which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top