SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 989

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
N S SANJAY GOWDA
SRI THANEMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SATHISHA D J ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner is seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider his representation dated 21.12.2024 by which he had exercised his right of first refusal and also the representation dated 12.02.2025, copies of which are produced at Annexures-D and F respectively.

2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was the existing lessee in respect of shop No.8 and this shop was sought to be auctioned for a period of 12 years and as required under the Circular dated 19.07.2019, the petitioner was afforded a right of first refusal. The clause which relates to award of right of first refusal is in the following terms:

“13. ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀð-03gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ §»gÀAUÀ ºÀgÁdÄ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ CAUÀr ªÀĽUÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «¯ÉêÁj ªÀiÁqÀĪÁUÀ ºÁ° EgÀĪÀ ªÁtÂdå ¸ÀAQÃtðzÀ ¨ÁrUÉzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå §»gÀAUÀ ºÀgÁdÄ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ°è ¨sÁUÀªÀ»¸ÀĪÀ CxÀªÁ Right of First Refusal £ÀÄß DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÁzÀgÀÄ MAzÀ£ÀÄß DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ F §UÉÎ °TvÀªÁV £ÀUÀgÀ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ ºÀgÁdÄ ¢£ÁAPÀPÉÌ MAzÀÄ ªÁgÀ ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁV w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ¤UÀ¢üvÀ ¢£ÁAPÀzÉÆ¼ÀUÉ °TvÀªÁV w½¸À¢zÀݰè CAvÀºÀ ¨ÁrUÉzÁgÀgÀÄ Right of First Refusal £ÀÄß DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®è ºÁUÀÆ CAvÀºÀ ¨ÁrUÉzÁ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top