Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
M/S TRANSVISION SOFTWARE AND DATA SOLUTIONS PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' business background (Para 2) |
| 2. tender notification details (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioners' representations (Para 4) |
| 4. petitioners' arguments against tender (Para 5) |
| 5. petitioners' locus standi (Para 6) |
| 6. respondent's counterarguments (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. court's examination of rival contentions (Para 15) |
| 8. locus standi and eligibility criteria (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 9. conditions not arbitrary (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The petitioners are companies incorporated under the Companies Act and asserts that they are in the field of development of software, implementation of E-Governance Projects and carrying out total revenue management systems, and also providing software and ITES services to Escoms in the energy Domine.
4. The petitioners asserts to have submitted there pre-bid queries and also representations to the second respondent highlighting that the tender conditions are one sided. Petitioners asserts that one more representation was submitted to the first respondent on 29.7.2021. However no steps were taken to alter the one sided conditions prompting the petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
