Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K. SOMASHEKAR, VENKATESH NAIK T, JJ
SMT. S.SAVITHRAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT.S.PADMAVATHAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property dispute. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. trial court's findings on issues framed. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 4. court's analysis of legal standards and evidence. (Para 39 , 40 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 5. conclusion on validity of gpas and dismissal of appeal. (Para 49 , 50) |
| 6. final order of the court. (Para 51) |
CAV JUDGMENT
The appellant Smt. S. Savitharamma has preferred this Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 CPC , being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 07.02.2020 passed in O.S.No. 2653/2006 by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal, Bangalore Rural District, dismissing the suit for partition and separate possession.
3. The facts of the case leading up to this appeal are as under:
4. On January 20, 1995, the Appellant herein / Savithramma executed a registered General Power of Attorney (GPA) in favour of her sister-in-law, Smt. S. Nagarathnamma / Respondent No.5, granting her authority, including the power to sell her portion of the share mea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
