HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
SMT M.SARASWATHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondents' failure to act is noted. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court mandates compliance by officials. (Para 4) |
| 4. writ petition allowed with compliance order. (Para 5) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Learned AGA, on instructions, submits that the petitioner's application is already processed and the Authorities will accomplish the phodi and durasti proceedings in accordance with law.
4. On careful examination of the writ papers, this Court is satisfied that there has been a failure on the part of respondent No.2, the Tahasildar, in executing the phodi and durasti despite explicit directions issued by this Court in W.P. No.17602/2023 on 27.11.2023. Consequently, this case warrants the issuance of a mandamus. Further, the Court notes that any future lack of diligence in compliance with orders passed by this Court will result in appropriate action being taken against the concerned officials for their failure to perform their duties.
ORDER
(ii) Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are hereby directed to forthwith conduct phodi and durasti by taking cognizance of the title deeds obtained by the petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.